Old Time Victrola Music Message Board
« Obama's "National Police Force" is on the way... »
Hey, MordEth, you have 9 messages, 0 are new. 9 Nov, 2008, 5:12pm
Welcome to The Old Time Victrola Music Message Board!
Due to recent issued involving spam on the board,
Guests may view the board without registering
but must register an account in order to
post new threads or respond to existing threads.
Unfortunately, this is the only way to stop the spam.
If this causes any inconvenience, or you have any questions,
guest posts will still be permitted in the "Technical Issues"
board on this forum.
I
like how you’re now making up words to try to insult people who do not
share your views, and have the ability to rationally dissect what you
have to say, when you don’t even know what you’re talking about.
Obviously,
one should not make rational decisions on who to elect, based on their
policies, track records in office, and the views, policies, and
behavior of their opponents. One should always strive to be an informed
voter. By the way, I’m still registered Independent, as much as you and
Dan the Doublethinker want to stereotype me otherwise.
It’s amazing to me that there is so much racism, bigotry and hate on a forum for the appreciation of music that includes the Jazz Age.
Am I the only one who realizes that we would not have this uniquely
American form of music if we were all Caucasians with the same beliefs?
Should we stop listening to opera if we aren’t Italian? Can one
appreciate Mozart without being Austrian? Where does the insanity end?
Seriously, if you are going to argue against a politician, at least take the time to read their platform, and argue the facts.
Kalash: Here, I’ll even make it easier for you. The Agenda CSS drop-down menu doesn’t seem to work when run through Google’s translation tools, but you can access them here and paste other URIs in.
Since you continue to fail at arguments, I accept your surrender.
Not when someone calls me a bigoted racist because I criticize the 'Chosen One'.
Dan, it’s really quite sad how many times I have to set you straight. You are not a bigoted racist because you criticize the ‘Chosen One’ (your usage, not mine). You are a bigoted racist because of the content of your criticism of Obama. But surely your intellectual credentials allow you to realize this, yes?
That type of criticism is all too reminiscent of Hitler's Germany.
Yes, Benito Gilmore, we have picked up on how quick you are to Godwin’s Law your way out of a debate or argument that you cannot win on facts. You lose again. I accept your surrender.
Do
you know that Jews going to the synagogue that faces Obama's House in
Chicago must put their names on a list with the Secret Service (SS [sic]) 24 hours ahead of time just to attend services?
You know, at this point I am stunned at your displayed cognitive powers. Seriously, did you actually read the articles that you are citing? From Fox News’s very first sentence in the article:
President-elect
Barack Obama's Chicago neighborhood has become a very different place
to live now that Secret Service agents have turned the once easy-going
area into a virtual fortress to protect the next president, The Times of London reported.
So let me get this straight, you are corroborating an article that merely quotes another article with the original article?
At what type of accredited university did you obtain your myriad (and unsubstantiated) “degrees in History and Economics”,
that would allow you to corroborate a source with that source’s source?
Seriously, the level of journalistic integrity displayed by The Dan Gilmore Times is laughable.
Perhaps you might want to check with more local sources of news
(e.g. ABC News in Chicago)? Alas, they did not confirm your 24-hour
list detail, mentioning only that they were required to show ID, and
one of the members of the synagogue stated:
“For me it seems like I’m on the safest block in America. So, for me, it’s worth it,” said Ayesha Aftab.
There definitely seems to be oppression going on down there, like The Dan Gilmore Times
insinuates. Watch the video they provide of the news story, and see how
concerned the people there seem to be about this perceived civil rights
outrage. Obviously the ‘virtual fortress’ that was nowhere to be seen
must have been covered up by ABC.
Now, let’s think about your commentary critically, shall we? First of all, what is Barack Obama, currently? The President-elect of the United States of America, and a Senator
representing Illinois. Now, what powers, pray tell, does the
President-elect have? None, until noon on 20 January, 2009, when he is
sworn into office. So right now, the only power Obama wields is as a
Senator of Illinois. Tell me, do Senators control the police or the United States Secret Service (which is actually abbreviated as USSS)? No, they do not. The Secret Service reports to the Department of Homeland Security, which is not controlled by Obama.
So
please explain to us, Dan, how is Obama responsible for the imagined
injustices that you are decrying? By being elected? By already having
at least one (if horribly inept) plot to assassinate him already foiled?
Is performing any sort of cursory fact-check anathema to The Dan Gilmore Times?
Because it seems you will write any sort of ridiculous slander, as long
as you can spin it into a negative slant that fits your ignorant,
racist, and bigoted beliefs.
I have no concern about Obama being half black - what bothers me is that he is all 100% red.
So
you claim, but the depths to which you stoop to make unfounded
ridiculous attacks on the man seem to indicate otherwise. You merely
attempt to dress it up in other concerns to hide the true nature of the
hatred and bigotry that you continue to spew. If you are truly not the
hateful racist bigot that you portray yourself to be, then attack the
man on his policies or on some actual real issue for which he is responsible. Doing otherwise only continues to prove my points.
Oh, I can't wait until everyone hears that US Secret Service (SS [sic])
is making Jews verify their identity 24 hours ahead of time to attend
services at a synagogue that happens to be actually 4 blocks and half a
mile away from Obama's home. I wonder if they make the members of Rev.
Wrights church do the say as it is only 2 blocks away from Obama's
Socialist Elite Mansion?
Your papers, please? No papers?
You’re
hell-bent on beating everyone to death with your delusional Nazi
parallels, aren’t you? I think I’ve covered this sufficiently above,
but to reiterate, since apparently you are not intelligent enough to
understand this: Obama is not in charge of either the Chicago Police Department or the United States Secret Service. Is that clear enough for you? Now lay off replacing "USSS" with "SS" to try to add your lovely racist Nazi slant.
Seriously, it’s tiresome, and it’s a rancid heap of nonsense.
Why doesn't Obama just have the Secret Service (SS [sic])
make attendees of the Synagogue wear little yellow stars on their coats
to speed up the identification process for purposes of efficiency?
This
is God D*amned disgusting, offensive and unconscionable. For God's
sake! Don't these idiots know what message they are sending? Have they
even the slightest clue? Does anyone have any idea of the message being
sent?
Just one little 'harmless' thing done that no one cares about. And that's how it all starts.
You’d
like that, wouldn’t you? The hateful little man, hiding behind his
computer keyboard to repetitively hammer his increasingly ridiculous
litany of hate with a never-ending deluge of badly-crafted lies and
attempts to twist reality to sell his message? Do you know who deserves the credit for the Department of Homeland Security, whose Secret Service you are accusing Obama of controlling? Your beloved Republican President, George W. Bush.
So,
unless Obama is actually a Darth Vader-esque automaton with George W.
Bush inside controlling him, once again your arguments are lies and
nonsense and a complete waste of your time and ours.
Of course, you could be doing something productive, like submitting your ‘expert’ opinion to help improve America for everyone,
but since you have demonstrated your lack of intellect and expertise, I
suppose this is impossible for you, and you will continue to argue
nonsense, lunacy, and lies in here.
Until you can argue a real
issue, for which Barack Obama is actually responsible, I can only infer
that you concede defeat, and once again I accept your surrender.
Dan Gilmore Administrator Pennypincher Gilmore member is offline
"Hell, there are no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something."------ Thomas Edison
Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 12,825 Location: Sometime round 1920
Re: Obama's "National Police Force" is on the way. « Reply #62 Today at 7:25am »
How is speaking out against what is absolutely wrong 'hateful'?
Quote:
Do
you know that Jews going to the synagogue that faces Obama's House in
Chicago must put their names on a list with the Secret Service (SS
[sic]) 24 hours ahead of time just to attend services?
I
suppose your next argument is that you can't hold Hitler responsible
for what the Brownshirts did because he didn't order it, exactly.
Obama
wouldn't have all this security if he didn't specifically request it.
He is responsible. This 'your papers, please' incident involving a
Synagogue DOES send a very clear message and it was INTENDED to send a
very clear message.
HOW DARE YOU even imply that pointing out
the truth is hateful. YOu are employing the exact tactics that Hitler,
Mussolini, Stalin and Franco used to try to marginalize and silence any
and all opposition.
YOU are exactly the same as the very
people in Germany who sat back and did nothing when the exact same
thing happened. You dismiss such abhorred and deplorable acts as
'unintentional' and harmless and then you accuse those who criticize,
quite validly, those actions as being 'hateful'.
So, let me
ask, someday, if and when they ask these people to sew on little yellow
stars to their shirts and coats will you say, "Oh, HE doesn't mean
anything by it; it's just for their own protection".
When they
silence free speech and all opposing opinions WHEN, not if they apply
their beloved "Fairness Doctrine" will you say, "Oh, HE doesn't mean
it."
When they finally reach into your own house, family and
private life and tell you, "Oh, HE is only doing it for your own good"
will you still be blind?
When they finally put the clamps on you, what will you do when there are no voices left to defend you?
This is always the way it begins. A little here, a little there, until finally it is everywhere and it's too late.
I'm sure Hitler, Franco, Mussolini and Stalin called their critics "hateful" too.
I
know more than just a few survivors of Hitler's Death Camps who have
the tattoos to show for it who all say, "This is exactly how it began
in Germany". Are they hateful too for drawing that conclusion from
their own experience?
Maybe I should invite a few Death Camp
survivors onto this board to tell you from their own live experiences
what a blind jackass you are and how very, very wrong you are.
Would you dare call them "hateful" for telling you exactly how it is?
Would you dare call them "hateful" for criticizing "The One"?
It starts in a neighborhood in Chicago with one little harmless 'security measure' and it enevitably ends up here:
And if you think it can't happen here, you are dead wrong.
And
not thinking it can happen here and being blind to even the slightest
hint to it happening is to assure that it will happen again and happen
right here.
Never again, I say. We must always be vigilant and
be outspoken, no matter what the abuse we get for pointing out at even
the tiniest little indications of tyranny and despotism. Never again.
But I suppose you will just call me "hateful" when I join in with the world wide chorus that cries out, "Never Again".
What
the Secret Service did in regards to that Synagogue in Chicago is
"Hateful" if you ask me and millions of other people who agree to
pledge to say, "Never Again". I don't care if they intended to send
such a message (and I fully believe that the message was absolutely
intended because no one could be so ignorant to not know the
implications) or not, but a message they did send and I say NEVER AGAIN!
You
are pathetic. You are blind to history and you are one of those who
facilitate it's repetition by your blind ignorance and intolerance of
those who have absolutely valid concerns when it comes to even the
slightest hint of crap like this.
So, just call me "Hateful" when I say, "NEVER AGAIN!"
Emanuel tied to Freddie Mac collapse; Update: The numbers for Emanuel posted at 11:30 am on November 7, 2008 by Ed Morrissey Send to a Friend | printer-friendly
During
the campaign, Barack Obama had to fight off assertions that Freddie Mac
and Fannie Mae had him in their pocket while the two GSEs committed
fraud and declined to their collapse. Obama didn’t help that perception
when he chose Jim Johnson, Fannie Mae’s former CEO and chair, as the
leader of his VP search committee, a position Johnson resigned shortly
afterwards. Now ABC reports that Obama’s new chief of staff, Rahm
Emanuel, sat on the board of Freddie Mac during the critical period:
President-elect
Barack Obama’s newly appointed chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, served on
the board of directors of the federal mortgage firm Freddie Mac at a
time when scandal was brewing at the troubled agency and the board
failed to spot “red flags,” according to government reports reviewed by
ABCNews.com.
According to a complaint later filed by the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Freddie Mac, known formally as the
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, misreported profits by billions
of dollars in order to deceive investors between the years 2000 and
2002.
Emanuel was not named in the SEC complaint (click here to
read) but the entire board was later accused by the Office of Federal
Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) (click here to read) of having
“failed in its duty to follow up on matters brought to its attention.”
Emanuel’s
action, or lack of it, came during a time when the SEC says Freddie Mac
misrepresented its income to investors in order to maintain its price.
In other words, they committed fraud. The SEC specifically notes that
Freddie did this in 2000, 2001, and 2002, and Emanuel sat on the board
in 2000-2001.
This is no small matter. Had this happened when
Sarbanes-Oxley was in effect, Emanuel would have had to sign off on
those numbers under penalty of perjury. He could be liable for criminal
prosecution. As it is, his actions and omissions as a board member may
still result in civil and criminal liability, if the SEC discovers that
he had a hand in the fraud committed at Freddie Mac, or if Emanuel knew
about it and failed to act to stop it.
For an incoming
administration that ran on cleaning up the greed on Wall Street, the
selection of Emanuel speaks a lot louder than any campaign promises.
One might think that anyone who sat on the boards of Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac while the two GSEs cooked the books and set the stage for
global financial collapse should at least be considered political
poison for any appointment, let alone one as significant as White House
Chief of Staff — if nothing else, then at least on the basis of
competence. Instead, it looks like Obama is bringing the Chicago Way to
Pennsylvania Avenue.
Hope and change, indeed.
Update: Business & Media Institute notes the numbers on Emanuel and Freddie Mac:
“Clinton’s
going-away gift to Emanuel was a seat on the quasi-governmental Freddie
Mac board, which paid him $231,655 in director’s fees in 2001 and
$31,060 in 2000,” Lynn Sweet wrote for the Chicago Sun-Times on Jan. 3,
2002.
During the time Emanuel spent on the board, Freddie Mac
was plagued with scandal involving campaign contributions and
accounting irregularities. Freddie Mac and its sister organization
Fannie Mae were taken over by the federal government in September 2008
after years of mismanagement and scandal. Treasury Secretary Henry
Paulson put the two beleaguered GSEs into a conservatorship, stripping
common stock shareholders of their rights to govern the companies. …
“Freddie
Mac was accused of illegally using corporate resources between 2000 and
2003 for 85 fundraisers that collected about $1.7 million for federal
candidates,” an Associated Press story from April 18, 2006 said. “Much
of the fundraising benefited members of the House Financial Services
Committee, a panel whose decisions can affect Freddie Mac.”
And,
since his successful run for the House of Representatives in 2002,
Emanuel has been the beneficiary of campaign cash from Freddie Mac and
its sister organization Fannie Mae – $51,750 according to the Center
for Responsive Politics Web site OpenSecrets.org.
That’s
certainly something to keep in mind while recalling the promises by
Barack Obama to change the way business gets conducted in Washington.
Joined: Jul 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 2,632 Location: Middle of England
Re: Obama's "National Police Force" is on the way. « Reply #64 Today at 8:43am »
Dare I intervene into this little
charade of an argument and say this: there are two clearly opposing
views on show here; probably neither are right as the truth is usually
somewhere in the middle BUT it has become a very depressing thread to
read and it is very clear to me that neither "side" has a single hope
in hell of convincing the other that they are "right" so what is the
point of carrying on, folks?
And
I do believe personally that it is a little bit sad to mix REAL
historical truths with potentially false future predictions. We're now
remembering today those dead from all wars of the past (and present) so
isn't it a little crass to confuse the Nazi state which presided over
the killing of 6 million Jews with Obama's policies which have only so
far been talked about, least of all, actioned?
I'll go back to PHONOGRAPHS now and let you two slug it out for another 7 weeks!
So,
let me ask, someday, if and when they ask these people to sew on little
yellow stars to their shirts and coats will you say, "Oh, HE doesn't
mean anything by it; it's just for their own protection"
Wow
Dan. Do you honestly believe that's even possible in this day &
age, & in the USA of all places. It just all seems a little far
fetched to me for some reason. As far as I can tell, the only reason
for the secret service involvement is to protect Obama from
assassination attempts by racist white supremacists or religious
extremists. Perhaps sewing a black heart or white halo on these peoples coats wouldn't be a bad idea
How is speaking out against what is absolutely wrong 'hateful'?
The
part of it where you are blatantly failing to denounce the parties
responsible, and as far as I can tell, only citing a news source that
is of dubious credibility and appears to be exaggerating the story.
I
suppose your next argument is that you can't hold Hitler responsible
for what the Brownshirts did because he didn't order it, exactly.
No,
my next argument is going to be to go through your post line by line
and tear you apart, which is something that you have yet to manage to
do to me because of the sheer logical fallacies of your arguments. Why
is it that I have never seen you write anything against Bush’s forays
into American fascism, but now Obama (who still has absolutely no power
to do the things of which you are accusing him) is the rebirth of
Hitler?
Seriously, Dan, can you please explain that to me? You
continue to cite the actions of people over which Obama has no control.
There’s a big difference between the people you are using as cases
against Obama and Hitler’s Sturmabteilung (which are also different from the Schutzstaffel (or SS), which you repeatedly want to confuse with the USSS).
To
be honest, I’m starting to wonder if you’re actually a closeted Nazi.
Lately, every post is “Hitler, Hitler, Hitler”. Does it make you angry
that one of my closest friends is of Iranian descent, and she married a
Jewish man? They’re quite happy together, and have two children. No
doubt you’d accuse her of being a terrorist.
Obama wouldn't have all this security if he didn't specifically request it.[citation needed] He is responsible.[citation needed]
This 'your papers, please' incident involving a Synagogue DOES send a
very clear message and it was INTENDED to send a very clear message.
So you’re telling me that despite all evidence to the contrary, Obama has specifically requested this level of protection?
From the ABC article:
The Secret Service does not discuss specifics, but said it will balance
providing a secure environment for Obama and his family with as little
an impact as possible on neighbors.
The Secret Service and
Chicago Police Department have been working on the plan, which is
constantly evolving, for more than a year.
You do
realize that basically what you are now saying is that over the last
year Obama has been plotting for how to oppress the people at his
synagogue?
And of course, you are ignoring Ayesha Aftab, who is
no doubt glad that there is a police and Secret Service presence so
that she or her fellow synagogue members have less to fear about being
in the line of fire when someone attempts to put deed to your rhetoric,
and decides to attempt to assassinate Obama.
Senator
Obama and I have had and argued our differences, and he has prevailed.
No doubt many of those differences remain. These are difficult times
for our country, and I pledge to him tonight to do all in my power to
help him lead us through the many challenges we face.
I urge all
Americans who supported me to join me in not just congratulating him,
but offering our next president our good will and earnest effort to
find ways to come together, to find the necessary compromises, to
bridge our differences, and help restore our prosperity, defend our
security in a dangerous world, and leave our children and grandchildren
a stronger, better country than we inherited.
Whatever our
differences, we are fellow Americans. And please believe me when I say
no association has ever meant more to me than that.
HOW DARE YOU even imply that pointing out the truth[citation needed] is hateful. YOu [sic]
are employing the exact tactics that Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin and
Franco used to try to marginalize and silence any and all opposition.
That’s
just it, Dan, you’re not pointing out the truth. You’re grasping at any
bit of sensationalist and questionable journalism you can find,
twisting it so hard to match your bias that it screams like the torture
victims under your beloved Bush, and patently ignoring any request for
you to support your arguments. Why aren’t you blaming the man responsible for the ‘Brownshirts’ that you are decrying? Because it doesn’t fit your agenda?
Plus, I am really impressed by how you keep projecting*. Who threatened censorship, Dan? You did. Who was it using religion as a grounds of attack? You were. Again, I could go on, but since you do not address my points, it is pointless.
Obviously,
I must be leading you and your family to the concentration camps,
because I can’t see how it is that I am ‘silencing’ you. And you’ve
become the Godwin’s Law radio programme: “All Nazis, all the time!”
Surprisingly, you have a functioning internet connection in Dachau, so I must be a failure as a fascist.
YOU
are exactly the same as the very people in Germany who sat back and did
nothing when the exact same thing happened. You dismiss such abhorred
and deplorable acts as 'unintentional' and harmless and then you accuse
those who criticize, quite validly, those actions as being 'hateful'.
No,
Dan, I did something already, like 53% of American voters. I voted
against McSame. I commend McCain for his stand against torture (and
thought he was a good choice in 2000), but 90% of the time he voted the
Republican party line, which has gotten us into the mess that our
nation is in, and is responsible for the eroded civil liberties that I
cited above. Of course, nowhere is there any evidence that you are
against the evils of your party; your litany of hate has apparently
latched on to Obama because:
a) You really are the racist, bigoted man that you seem to be, and cannot stand that half his heritage is African-American.
b)
You are a poor loser and are bitterly (and rabidly) disappointed that
your candidate was judged wanting by the American people, and so must
lash out in your hate and rage.
c) Like your oft-mentioned
Hitler wanting to blame all of Germany’s problems on the Jews, you
insist on blaming all of America’s problems on Obama, because he is a
convenient scapegoat, and you find it easy to get other bigoted racist
people to support you in this view.
So,
let me ask, someday, if and when they ask these people to sew on little
yellow stars to their shirts and coats will you say, "Oh, HE doesn't
mean anything by it; it's just for their own protection".
When
they silence free speech and all opposing opinions WHEN, not if they
apply their beloved "Fairness Doctrine" will you say, "Oh, HE doesn't
mean it."
When they finally reach into your own house, family
and private life and tell you, "Oh, HE is only doing it for your own
good" will you still be blind?
When they finally put the clamps on you, what will you do when there are no voices left to defend you?
This is always the way it begins. A little here, a little there, until finally it is everywhere and it's too late.
I'm sure Hitler, Franco, Mussolini and Stalin called their critics "hateful" too.
I
know more than just a few survivors of Hitler's Death Camps who have
the tattoos to show for it who all say, "This is exactly how it began
in Germany". Are they hateful too for drawing that conclusion from
their own experience?
Maybe I should invite a few Death Camp
survivors onto this board to tell you from their own live experiences
what a blind jackass you are and how very, very wrong you are.
Would you dare call them "hateful" for telling you exactly how it is?
Would you dare call them "hateful" for criticizing "The One"?
It starts in a neighborhood in Chicago with one little harmless 'security measure' and it enevitably ends up here:
[Deletia: embedded “Arbeit macht frei” image that you failed to link properly.]
And if you think it can't happen here, you are dead wrong.
And
not thinking it can happen here and being blind to even the slighted
hint to it happening is to assure that it will happen again and happen
right here.
But I suppose you will just call me "hateful" when I join in with the world side chorus that cries out, "Never Again".
Sure,
Dan. Please fetch some Holocaust survivors to convince me that the evil
white man inside the Darth Vader-esque Barack Obama suit is not
actually George W. Bush, it’s really your pal Adolf, and he’s been
resurrected. I feel absolutely zero threat that you actually know
Holocaust survivors that believe Obama is really Hitler. I’m perfectly
aware of their experiences, not only have I visited the Florida Holocaust Museum when I lived in St. Petersburg, Florida, I knew and spoke with people who survived it.
The
reason I voted the way that I (and a majority of other Americans) did
was to say “never again” to the last eight years of Republican
fascism under ‘The Decider’. Unlike Adolf Gilmore and Иосиф
Kalash, I made an effort to be an informed voter, and I still believe
that things look brighter for having Obama as President-elect than
McCain. If you don’t participate in democracy, you can’t legitimately complain that your voice is not heard.
But
back to your threats to bring in others to parrot your arguments: get
anyone you can find who can argue your case for you, with actual facts,
citations and support for their arguments, and the ability to
demonstrate logic and reasoning. You are an epic failure on all of
these counts. Of course, I suppose I should not expect better from a
man who (despite all of the polls) ‘personally guaranteed’ that McCain
would win the election. All along, you’ve been wrong. (In fact, so
wrong you believe Palin is qualified to be President, when she doesn’t even know what the Vice President does.) No wonder you’re bitter.
Do
you have ties to an industry that is making record profits (e.g. the
oil industry) as the rest of the economy tanks? Are you worried that
Obama will take away the ‘favorite son’ treatment such industries have
had under Bush/Cheney? Perhaps you’re concerned that there are not
enough Republicans to continue to trample civil liberties?
Despite
all of your unsubstantiated pseudo-intellectual posturing, you seem to
persist in deliberately misunderstanding me or ignoring all of the
points in my posts, merely to respond with more lies, exaggerations,
logical fallacies, etc.
You’re projecting*
again. But then, I suppose if you could somehow magically swap places
with me, you would, so you’d finally be winning this argument.
Dare
I intervene into this little charade of an argument and say this: there
are two clearly opposing views on show here; probably neither are right
as the truth is usually somewhere in the middle BUT it has become a
very depressing thread to read and it is very clear to me that neither
"side" has a single hope in hell of convincing the other that they are
"right" so what is the point of carrying on, folks?
Steve, I don’t think that there is much point in intervening, as Dan seems hell-bent to smear Obama as either:
a) A fascist. b) Totalitarian. c) Communist. d) Socialist. e) Marxist. f) The newest and greatest escalation: the reincarnation of Hitler. g) Stalin. h) Mussolini. i) Franco. j) All of the above.
I’ve offered him many opportunities to try to convince me, pointing him repeatedly at Obama’s policy (and laudable effort to increase democracy online),
but he persists in ignoring it and coming up with craziness, lies, and
distorted interpretations of events to argue his cause.
As far
as I can tell at the moment, he is arguing that the Darth Vader-esque
Obama suit is no longer worn by George W. Bush; ‘The Decider’ has been
replaced by the Second Coming of Hitler. And woe upon us all.
And
I do believe personally that it is a little bit sad to mix REAL
historical truths with potentially false future predictions. We're now
remembering today those dead from all wars of the past (and present) so
isn't it a little crass to confuse the Nazi state which presided over
the killing of 6 million Jews with Obama's policies which have only so
far been talked about, least of all, actioned?
A
little sad? I feel sorry for anyone on this board who is Jewish. I
think that, were I Jewish, I would feel insulted that the suffering of
my people was merely one more deceitful weapon in Dan the Fascist’s
litany of hate, racism, and bigotry.
Ironically, all of the the Jews that I know voted for Obama.
I don’t think this is a very useful statistic, but it is very amusing in light of Dan’s Obama = Hitler arguments. That, and the neo-Nazis want to kill Hitler Obama.
Dan Gilmore Administrator Pennypincher Gilmore member is offline
"Hell, there are no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something."------ Thomas Edison
Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 12,825 Location: Sometime round 1920
Re: Obama's "National Police Force" is on the way. « Reply #68 Today at 1:29pm »
That's it. I will not be subjected to being called a racist, bigot or
any other name by a screaming socialist and I will not be bullied into
falling into lock-step with any socialist or any other form of
totalitarian ignorance.
You
want change? I'll give you some change. Call it censorship or anything
you like. I've let this sh*t go on for too long. My limit and tolerance
had been reached.
Thread locked. I sincerely hope that when I
read you next posts in other threads that you don't really piss me off
with your outrageous epithets.
Changes will be implemented on this board. I hope you like the change you get.
Thread Locked.
The Admin Has Spoken. There is no recourse. And it's all because of you.
![[Home]](files/home.gif)
![[Help]](files/help.gif)
![[Search]](files/search.gif)
![[Members]](files/members.gif)
![[Profile]](files/profile.gif)
![[Logout]](files/logout.gif)
![[Live Chat]](files/chat.gif)
![[Search This Thread]](files/search2.gif)
![[Add Bookmark]](files/bookmark.gif)
![[Send Topic To Friend]](files/sendtopic.gif)
![[Print]](files/print.gif)
Author
![[avatar]](files/rock.gif)
![[icq]](files/online.gif)
![[yim]](files/yim.gif)
![[msn]](files/msn.gif)
![[aim]](files/aim.gif)
![[homepage]](files/www_sm.gif)
![[email]](files/email_sm.gif)
![[send pm]](files/message_sm.gif)
Logged
![[avatar]](files/edison.jpg)
![[image]](files/arbeitmachtfreigh6.jpg)
![[avatar]](files/ussr03190jj.jpg)
![[avatar]](files/f_gen065m_fe4528f.jpg)
![[avatar]](files/scan0002kg6.jpg)
